FAQS



Q. In simple terms, what is a time coach?

A. A time coach is a great self-leveller, helping you find your benchmark for life, perfectly suited for you, and from which you can move forward with developing your creative ideas in everyday life.

Q. What can time coaching do for me?

A. Time coaching helps you discover and explore your true nature. It all begins by creating an interdependent state of mind at the individual level, combining your faculties of the intellect and the intuition so that you first find equality within yourself, your sweet spots of abundance, which you will then automatically project outwards in your everyday actions and experiences, individually and collectively. In this sense, you create your own reality, always working from the inside-out.

Q. In the Appendix to the manual it states that meditation is not necessary to connect to your natural self — is mindfulness not important?

A. Mindfulness is exceptionally important, and fundamentally represents the ‘rest’ phase discussed in the manual. For that reason, mindfulness can take any form of ‘rest’ from ‘work’.

Meditation can be thought of as an extreme form of rest, sitting at the opposite end of the spectrum to extreme sports. There are then many other forms of mindfulness which exist between the two extremes, and as mentioned in the manual, regular walking is a good start.

One problem we currently face is that mindfulness ‘techniques’ are now entering the mainstream, and on the whole they are being misapplied because the mechanics of time and the whole nature of the ego are not yet fully understood — falsely believing the ego to be a largely negative phenomena, rather than seeing it as a neutral tool like any other, and a natural one at that. Because of these unfortunate misconceptions and critical gaps in whole knowledge, mindfulness techniques can cause you more harm than good if not approached properly.

Crucially, any mindfulness technique should be undertaken with a full and unequivocal intent to first ‘slow down’, and to review and alter any current work actions that are causing you difficulties.

If you otherwise use the knowledge and energy you gain from mindfulness techniques to ‘speed up’ in a working sense then you are likely moving yourself into more difficulties, not less.

It is crucial that this dynamic is fully taken on board. Like Marty in Back To The Future, it is important to consciously decide to first go back to then go forwards, to commit to changing any aspects of your life that you are not currently comfortable with, and which only you alone can do, from the inside-out.

Depending on your current situation, this can be one of the greatest hurdles to overcome, as sometimes there can seem to be no way out from the way you work, especially when this is often tied in with money factors.

Q. The concept of creating your own reality is mentioned quite often here. Is this the same as the current trend of ‘manifesting’?

A. Yes and No. Beyond a certain point, care and awareness is required to know which kind of energy is fuelling it — is it self-creative like nuclear fusion, or self-consuming like nuclear fission? — this ‘blind spot’ is one reason why some of the original information presented in the 1970s is currently being unwittingly misapplied through misinterpretation.

It’s one thing to have evolved the ability to manifest, to ‘manufacture’ a physical reality from the ‘next level’, but it’s another thing knowing how to use it to create abundance rather than scarcity — though by knowing through experience how it can create scarcity you then come to realise how to ‘flip it’ to create abundance, or infinite nature to use equivalent terminology.

It is truer to think of manifesting as having two ‘states’ — an active state and a passive state — and truer again to realise that both of these states exist ‘simultaneously’. The skill is in knowing which ‘state’ is exhibiting the most dominant ‘trend’ in any given moment, and then riding that wave until the ‘direction’ of the dominant trend changes.

Even when ‘riding the wave’, these two states, active and passive, will both be operating at the same time, so in some ways the word ‘dominant’ is not the best word to use, it is simply used to indicate the ‘seasonal’ phase of multidimensional time cycles — for example, active being spring/summer, and passive being autumn/winter, but interpreted in the sense of a ‘seasonal’ mind. Here, as always, the relatively narrow three-dimensional physical world is giving us clues, models even, as to how the ‘more-dimensional’ mind works.

It’s not really that difficult to get your head around both states happening simultaneously, at the same time. Again, with the earth’s seasons, both winter and summer are happening at the same time, depending on which hemisphere you are occupying. But perhaps an even better way to understand this is to look at stockmarket charts, which are going up and down at the same time, but there will be ‘dominant’ trends one way or another in any given moment — howsoever we wish to define a ‘moment’. To use scientific language, it is a fractal expression — and when considering ‘the mind’, this expression is of infinite proportions, from the imperceivably very small (the infinitesimal), then through a ‘visible’ point of perception which can be intellectually perceived, then continuing on to the imperceivably very large (the infinite).

At this point we then have to be careful as to how we apply the word ‘imperceivably’, as these trends of ‘infinite’ proportions will be undetectable as far as the intellect is concerned, but not to the intuition — hence the reason why you become again a time coach by combining both these faculties to create an interdependent state of mind — an intuitive intellect, or intellectual intuition, a universal state of mind, a classical-quantum state of mind, or using whichever words or phrases we choose to ‘label’ this mental approach. In many ways, it is simple common sense, albeit operating at more complex multidimensional levels of expression and experience — the ‘next level’ in human evolutionary terms.

What is interesting to note here, is that because it is ‘common sense’, something which we the ‘great body of the people’ possess from the ground-up, then the key to evolving into the ‘next levels’ comes through the natural networking of all these great minds of common sense, as everyone then brings everything to the ‘one’ table, for all to enjoy and benefit from.

Q. What does it mean to be multidimensional?

A. Among other things, being multidimensional means you can take an ‘idea’ and make it ‘real’. As you come across ‘ideas’ that are being shared, those which seem to be positive and those which seem to be negative, you can start to form your own version of that idea, putting your unique angle on it, so to speak. This angle in one sense is neither positive or negative, it’s simply natural.

Being natural, this idea is then able to self-seed, to reproduce itself, to seek form, and a reality of its own which you can then share in and enjoy. This ‘process’ has also been termed energy transmutation., or transmuting energy. In other words, if we are looking at this from the point of experiencing ‘negative energy’ then this negative energy can be transformed into ‘positive energy’.

In one sense, this approach is to do with learning how to time travel, learning how to ‘optimise’ your space-time continuum. We do this already, but at a very slow pace, as we are always learning. Once however you reach a certain point of learning, there is an acceleration of expression and experience — in some ways a parallel version, albeit deeply mental, of an industrial revolution and its subsequent developments — as all of a sudden the learning curve ‘takes off’.

Q. Is there an easy way I can understand the concepts and the relationship of the soul and the ego?

A. Yes. First it is important to emphasise that the soul and the ego do not exist at ‘opposite’ ends of a spectrum to each other, but exist one within the other, in a kind of fractal relationship. For this reason it is better to think in terms of direction of focus in relative terms, rather than either existing as absolute or static ‘states’, separate from each other — it is such ‘absolute’ or purely objective static thinking which creates what may be called a split mind, a kind of self-stalemating — warring factions at its extremes, which we create from within, and then see projected without.

When the Soul (or Ego) chooses to focus on a particular path of learning, of which there are infinite, it moves in the ego direction, becoming relatively more ‘specialised’ and less ‘all-rounder’ in its workings, whilst in that moment. When the ego chooses to defocus on a particular path of learning, it moves in the soul direction, becoming relatively less ‘specialised’ and more ‘all-rounder’ in its workings, whilst in that moment.

The words ‘soul’ and ‘ego’ are capitalised at the beginning of the above paragraph to indicate the ‘whole’ process at play, though it can really go by every name, and no name — names are simply designations to help refer to processes which are always in flux, yet retain their identity. The concepts only seem separate because we have, for a time, chosen to separate them, for the purposes of exploring and further developing our conscious self-awareness, a kind of outbound journey from a place of relative rest. There then is a time when the concepts are ready to come back together again, a kind of return journey, from relative work — to (re)integrate and (re)liberate.

It is useful to note here that a ‘collective’ soul can be known as an oversoul, and a ‘collective’ ego can be known as a superego.

They are essentially one and the same, which becomes increasingly apparent once you choose to locate the ‘sweet spots’.

And going back to the original question, in short, you can think of the soul as your natural self, your idea generator, and the ego as your artificer self, the one which ‘processes’ and ‘programs’ your natural self, your idea constructor — always infinitely in flux — the all-rounder, and the specialist; the client, and the contractor.